Download PDF Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes
If you ally need such a referred Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes book that will offer you value, obtain the most effective vendor from us now from several popular publishers. If you wish to entertaining publications, several novels, tale, jokes, as well as more fictions compilations are additionally launched, from best seller to the most recent released. You could not be puzzled to delight in all book collections Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes that we will offer. It is not regarding the prices. It has to do with what you require currently. This Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes, as one of the best sellers below will be one of the appropriate options to check out.
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes
Download PDF Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes
Discover a lot more experiences and expertise by checking out guide qualified Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes This is a publication that you are seeking, right? That corrects. You have concerned the right site, then. We always provide you Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes and also the most favourite books in the globe to download and install and took pleasure in reading. You could not disregard that seeing this collection is a function or even by unintended.
When getting this book Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes as recommendation to read, you can get not simply motivation however also new knowledge and also lessons. It has greater than typical advantages to take. What sort of e-book that you read it will be beneficial for you? So, why should get this publication entitled Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes in this write-up? As in web link download, you can obtain the book Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes by on-line.
When obtaining the book Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes by on the internet, you could review them wherever you are. Yeah, also you are in the train, bus, hesitating listing, or various other locations, online publication Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes could be your buddy. Every time is a great time to check out. It will improve your understanding, fun, amusing, driving lesson, and also experience without spending even more cash. This is why on-line publication Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes ends up being most really wanted.
Be the first which are reading this Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes Based on some factors, reviewing this book will certainly supply more perks. Also you have to read it step by action, web page by page, you could finish it whenever and any place you have time. Again, this on-line e-book Answering The Objections Of Atheists, Agnostics, And Skeptics, By Ron Rhodes will offer you simple of reading time and also task. It additionally supplies the encounter that is budget friendly to get to and get considerably for better life.
Many arguments from atheists, agnostics, and skeptics are difficult, or at least intimidating, for most Christians to answer. With clear reasoning and understandable language Ron Rhodes provides readers with the explanations and scriptural background they need to respond to common arguments against faith including:
- There is no such thing as absolute truth.
- Genesis is a myth, not a scientific account.
- A loving God cannot exist--there is too much evil and suffering.
- If God created all things, how did He create Himself?
- Sin is an outdated concept.
With this resource, Christians will be able to confidently respond to logical arguments against the foundations of Christianity.
- Sales Rank: #852815 in Books
- Published on: 2006-02-01
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.50" h x .64" w x 5.51" l, .81 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 304 pages
- ISBN13: 9780736912884
- Condition: New
- Notes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
Review
"Here at KGMI, my co-host and I have interviewed hundreds of authors on spiritual issues during our unique faith-based talk show on a popular newstalk, secular radio station. It was our delight to recently discover author Ron Rhodes and his new book Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics. Ron was dynamic and articulate in answering our questions, but most importantly, he persuaded a local atheist to begin opening his heart and mind to God! This young 20-something male listener dropped by our broadcast center the following day to tell me that Ron was the first person who had really adequately explained major questions he'd had about God for years. I believe that Ron's book will definitely appeal to those intellectual minds who need a different approach from the church."
--Debbie Chavez, co-host of The Connection on KGMI in Washington State
About the Author
Ron Rhodes, president of Reasoning from the Scriptures Ministries, is heard regularly on nationwide radio and is the author of Bite-Size Bible Answers, Bite-Size Bible Definitions, Commonly Misunderstood Bible Verses and 5-Minute Apologetics for Today. He holds ThM and ThD degrees from Dallas Theological Seminary and teaches there and at several other seminaries.
Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
Another Ron Rhodes masterpieces
By Mike G
Another Ron Rhodes masterpieces. Ron Rhodes is a fantastic Bible Scholar who I've listened to on KTIS radio two hours a month on "Live the Promise". He's an exceptional scholar and his books are filled with information and answers.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful.
Not really for arguing with Atheists and Skeptics
By claude whitacre
A well written book aimed at Christians. The title intrigued me, so I bought the book.
I'm sorry, but the objections the author talks about are not really points atheists bring up. The arguments presented wouldn't change an atheist's or skeptics mind either.
Other reviews go more into specific examples of this.
The book is written to make the reader feel armed with intelligent arguments in favor of Christian beliefs. I think it serves that purpose well.
But talk to a real critical thinker? Every argument presented is easily picked apart. I will say this though, in Bible studies? The author has some insights to add.
But trying to convince a scientist that his science is wrong? These aren't the methods. And no critical thinker I know would bring up the "Objections" that the author answers. Lots of straw man objections that are easily overcome using no logic at all.
But for the aright audience? Convincing.
42 of 61 people found the following review helpful.
Objections Sustained
By Ashtar Command
The purpose of this book is not really to convince atheists, agnostics and sceptics to become Christians. Rather, the purpose is to explain to Christians what bad people atheists are. In other words, the books is defensive in character, not offensive. The author often charicatures the atheist position. Often, he starts quoting the Bible as proof, even before he reaches the point where he ostensibly proves the Bible. No well-grounded atheist will be convinced by this book, nor is that the intention. The authors' point is to preach to the choir, hopefully keeping them in check.
Going through every argument would be tedious, so I stick to the main methodological flaws in the book.
First, Rhodes places heavy emphasis on a kind of philosophical paradoxes, such as "The claim that everything is relative is itself absolute and hence self-refuting" or "The claim that only the empirically verifiable is true cannot be empirically verified itself, and is hence false". He even mentions something called "the kalam argument", apparently a Muslim version of Zeno's Paradox. I'm not a philosopher, so perhaps that's why I am singularly unimpressed! Even if this or that statement is paradoxical according to some criterion of formal logic, so what? Zeno's Paradox isn't taken seriously by anyone. Empirically verifiable claims are still more certain than non-verifiable ones. And if everything is in constant flux ("relative"), pointing this out "absolutely" doesn't make it any less true. Perhaps the authors intended audience at some evangelical Bible seminary in Texas are impressed by these arguments. Well, I'm not. Besides, even Ron Rhodes accepts empirical verifiability when it suits his purposes. He attempts to prove the Bible by appeals to archeology and claims that Intelligent Design is...well, empirically verifiable. As for the truth being relative, atheists do *not* say that truth is relative. For instance, atheists are reasonably sure that God doesn't exist, that Darwin was right, and that a Bronze Age document decreeing genocide (a.k.a the Book of Joshua) contradicts modern principles of morality.
I already pointed out that the book isn't really intended for an atheist audience, which may explain why some of Rhodes arguments strikes the sceptical reader as very odd. For instance, he asserts that Peter cannot have lied about the Resurrection, since he was trained since childhood in the Ten Commandments, which prohibits false witness! Come again? A sceptic might point out that Peter may have been mistaken, that the Resurrection stories may have been embellished by later tradition, or that he may indeed have been - dare I say it - lying. New religions are founded as we speak, they can be studied by scholars, and often their origins are an amazing melange of subjectively honest spiritual experiences, half-truths due to politic, and out-right lies. Why should we believe that Christianity was any different?
But the main problem with the book is that it's methodologically disingenious. In one chapter, Rhodes uses the Big Bang to "prove" that God exists. BUT IN A FOOTNOTE HE ADMITS OF BEING A YOUNG EARTH CREATIONIST!!! He therefore doesn't believe in the Big Bang himself!!!
How can a non-believer in an old universe and the Big Bang nevertheless concoct a chapter using the Big Bang as an apologetic tool? Personal dishonesty may be one explanation, but I think the rabbit hole goes deeper. I come across this problem in other "fundamentalist" texts as well. A real classic in this field is "When Critics Ask" by Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, a book that can be paraphrased thus: "The Bible is absolutely free from errors and contradictions, because it says so. If the Bible contradicts modern science, either modern science is wrong, or the Bible has been misunderstood. Either way, the Bible is right. The solution to Bible contradiction X is either Y, or maybe Z, or maybe Y and Z combined. No matter what, the Bible is true. And if we cannot explain away something, just blame it on scribal error. After all, only the original manuscripts were inspired". (If you don't believe me, please obtain this book for yourself. It's very funny.)
The problem, clearly, is this. Rhodes have already made up his mind about the Bible being inerrant in all its (original?) paragraphs. He reached that conclusion WITHOUT the help of apologetics. Presumably he reached it for some kind of psychological or sociological reasons. Only then, AFTER his conversion, did he started to look around for apologetical arguments. He found the Big Bang here, some philosophical paradoxes there, and decided to use it. In the end, the veracity of each tool, taken by itself, doesn't really matter, since he already "knows" that the Bible is correct. And this approach is not peculiar to Rhodes himself, but typical of the fundamentalist approach in general. I found it in Norman Geisler, publications by the ICR and Answers in Genesis, etc.
But it's precisely this method, this dogmatism, that smacks "atheists, agnostics, and sceptics" as a very bad answer to their objections.
ADDENDUM, 23 MAY 2012
I wrote this during my atheist-materialist period. Today I'm more into dualism, deism and such ideas. When I recently looked through Rhodes' book again, I realized that it's *even worse* than indicated in my review. For that reason, the review stays.
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes PDF
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes EPub
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes Doc
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes iBooks
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes rtf
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes Mobipocket
Answering the Objections of Atheists, Agnostics, and Skeptics, by Ron Rhodes Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment